This is my first try for a jing recording...
[image: Bikini Beach 1964]
Bikini Beach (1964)Titre original : Bikini Beach
Sortie : 1964-07-22
Score : 6.7 de 13 utilisateurs
Durée : 99 min.
Directeur : Am...
5 years ago
4/04/2010
3/07/2010
Social Networking Site
The Bebo social networking site went live in 2005. It stands for “blog early, blog often” and was aimed at 30-somethings but was not quite a hit. The site is still in existence but was sold to 2008 to AOL. It is popular because the moderators are there for support and the users can do unique things like doodle and scribble on each others pages. There has not been a demise of Bebo as of yet but I read that AOL is looking to sell so this may be for profit or to unload it because of demise. I think the competitors, like Facebook and MySpace, are more popular because Bebo is ranked #3 for social networking sites. Also, I always hear about MySpace and Facebook more often but I have heard of Bebo which means it is probably mainstream (I am behind concerning computer stuff). I do not think I would open an account. It seems to have some fun things to add to a profile but I don’t know that many people with a Bebo account so I don’t think I would use it that much. I have a Facebook account and most people I know use that so it is better to keep in contact with friends and such. Also, I can’t keep up with belonging to so many sites so I try to focus on one.
Classroom 2.0
“Engagement trumps topic”…Steve Hargadon states this in his blog. He is referring to building effective social networks and I like this. This seems so true about the internet. People can create as many social networks as they can about as many topics they can think of but if no one is engaged in the site then participants will not come back to it.
I am stumped as to how one can create this engagement or if it’s kismet. Doesn’t it depend on the participants and their dynamic? Isn’t it sort of like the luck of the draw? I don’t see that someone can ensure the engagement.
As far as content or a class that social networking may work…subjects like English or history because there would most likely be a lot to discuss. I am also thinking of an art class or music class because of the access to post or link to artwork or audio or video clips. I do not think social networking would be such a great idea for math because I am not that into the subject and therefore do not see much potential for social networking. Then again, “engagement trumps topic” so there is no guarantee for success based on content or subject!
I am stumped as to how one can create this engagement or if it’s kismet. Doesn’t it depend on the participants and their dynamic? Isn’t it sort of like the luck of the draw? I don’t see that someone can ensure the engagement.
As far as content or a class that social networking may work…subjects like English or history because there would most likely be a lot to discuss. I am also thinking of an art class or music class because of the access to post or link to artwork or audio or video clips. I do not think social networking would be such a great idea for math because I am not that into the subject and therefore do not see much potential for social networking. Then again, “engagement trumps topic” so there is no guarantee for success based on content or subject!
2/28/2010
Wiki...(click here to go to my 1st attempt)
How might educators use a wiki in class? What would be the purpose? What sort of content would it contain? What would be the expectations of students for contributions to the wiki?
There are many ways to use a wiki in an educational setting. It could be used in literature classes as a place for discussion or to find resources. A wiki could be used in health or physical education classes to show videos of exercises or have links to related websites and students could search the net for websites and post them. For math, students could share their short cut ideas or find different ways to solve problems. A cooking teacher could use a wiki for recipe posting and tips for cooking and of course the students would contribute also.
I think the purpose of a wiki in most educational uses would be for student collaboration/contribution and a place for them to find resources for their class. It would be great for students with disabilities to contribute and even for the shy kid. Students could take their time and even use technology gadgets for disabilities if needed.
The content is only limited by the imaginations of the users/creators. The expectations of students using the wiki could be contributing relevant information, using it appropriately, and following wiki (and internet) etiquette. The teacher would go over all of the specific expectations with the class because these would also differ from class to class. One teacher may want graphics or videos added while another may only want writing.
2/21/2010
Our Author's Blog
I searched through our author, Will Richardson’s, blog to find arguments I agreed or disagreed with. The scope of his blog is quite large so I focused on blogs involving classroom practice, politics, schools…
One blog I found interesting was this one: http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/as-parents-how-should-we-assess-schools/. This one caught my eye because we have more options for schools than just the one in your area. We can send our children to schools based on religion, Waldorf or Montessori theory, public, Multiple Intelligence or project based; the list goes on. Parents can help decide which school would be the best for their children education. As for our high schools in the area, we only have a few to choose from which disheartens me. As pointed out in some of the comments on the blog, parents become less involved with their children’s education as they grow older. I digress…back to the blog…The author’s questions following questions made me think: how are we advocating for our kids? How are we assessing schools? What should we demanding of schools in the 21st century?
Firstly, I have realized that I am not advocating for my high school student at all and I don’t even know where to begin. It is partly my child’s attitude that worries me but also the school. Seems she is mostly concerned with the social aspect of school and not learning at all. She doesn’t see how or why what she is being taught is pertinent to her life. While she needs to be motivated in her learning, I would really appreciate if the teachers or school could find a way to help her see meaning in what they are doing. As an educator myself, I am always trying to think of how to make things interesting and meaningful for the students and I guess I am expecting this from fellow educators as well. Still, I do not how to go about this.
Secondly, how are we assessing our schools? Are we looking for the A+ sign on the front of the building? Do we base it on test scores or awards won through sports? I used to base it on the A+. Then, as I visited and observed more schools, I saw that this didn’t show what goes on in the classroom and the environment. It wasn’t an actual representation of the school. Now, I look at the interaction between students and teachers. I look at the type of learning and activity that goes on in a classroom. I don’t want my children taught to the test. I want their experience in school to be like life and not separate. It should be authentic. This leads to the last question.
Finally, what should we demand of schools in the 21st century? I agree with the author: “I wish I would have heard more of those types of responses about the high school. I wish I would have heard stories of kids changing the world, of pushing through personal barriers, of creative expressions, of challenges met, of real work for real purposes. I wish it had been more than PSATs and AP tests.” I want to schools to address the whole child and to spark their minds and to help them find their place in the world. All I hear about are how the schools are cutting things out to teach to the tests because this is what the schools/teachers are being judged on. I was talking to one teacher about including the kinds of things I am learning about in EDU 255 into her class and she responded, “I do not have time to include things that aren’t going to be on The Tests.”
One blog I found interesting was this one: http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/as-parents-how-should-we-assess-schools/. This one caught my eye because we have more options for schools than just the one in your area. We can send our children to schools based on religion, Waldorf or Montessori theory, public, Multiple Intelligence or project based; the list goes on. Parents can help decide which school would be the best for their children education. As for our high schools in the area, we only have a few to choose from which disheartens me. As pointed out in some of the comments on the blog, parents become less involved with their children’s education as they grow older. I digress…back to the blog…The author’s questions following questions made me think: how are we advocating for our kids? How are we assessing schools? What should we demanding of schools in the 21st century?
Firstly, I have realized that I am not advocating for my high school student at all and I don’t even know where to begin. It is partly my child’s attitude that worries me but also the school. Seems she is mostly concerned with the social aspect of school and not learning at all. She doesn’t see how or why what she is being taught is pertinent to her life. While she needs to be motivated in her learning, I would really appreciate if the teachers or school could find a way to help her see meaning in what they are doing. As an educator myself, I am always trying to think of how to make things interesting and meaningful for the students and I guess I am expecting this from fellow educators as well. Still, I do not how to go about this.
Secondly, how are we assessing our schools? Are we looking for the A+ sign on the front of the building? Do we base it on test scores or awards won through sports? I used to base it on the A+. Then, as I visited and observed more schools, I saw that this didn’t show what goes on in the classroom and the environment. It wasn’t an actual representation of the school. Now, I look at the interaction between students and teachers. I look at the type of learning and activity that goes on in a classroom. I don’t want my children taught to the test. I want their experience in school to be like life and not separate. It should be authentic. This leads to the last question.
Finally, what should we demand of schools in the 21st century? I agree with the author: “I wish I would have heard more of those types of responses about the high school. I wish I would have heard stories of kids changing the world, of pushing through personal barriers, of creative expressions, of challenges met, of real work for real purposes. I wish it had been more than PSATs and AP tests.” I want to schools to address the whole child and to spark their minds and to help them find their place in the world. All I hear about are how the schools are cutting things out to teach to the tests because this is what the schools/teachers are being judged on. I was talking to one teacher about including the kinds of things I am learning about in EDU 255 into her class and she responded, “I do not have time to include things that aren’t going to be on The Tests.”
2/14/2010
My teaching philosophy thus far
I think in order to learn students need to be in a safe, caring, and positive environment. I like to create a community in our classroom by singing songs with the students’ names, doing dances with switching partners, and things like that. I like to have opportunities for collaborative and individual learning. This helps bring the students out of their shells and help them get along with others.
I think in teaching, if one can make the learning apply to real life, students are more willing to participate and also remember things better. Projects are an effective way for students to see a culmination of their learning and/or put it into practice or use.
I think it is important to use many different approaches to teaching so the students get more out of it; addressing the multiple intelligences and using left/right brain activities make learning easier and more fun for students. Using Multiple Intelligences theory, “taps into students' intrinsic levels of motivation through natural talents, thus helping teachers construct self-motivating educational experiences and ones which help promote the concept of flow in the classroom,” (http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/mi/wilson1.htm).
An article for tips and resources for putting MI theory into practice can be found at: http://www.edutopia.org/multiple-intelligences-immersion-enota-how-to.
In my philosophy of teaching, it should be as natural as possible and be applicable to real life and the students’ lives. The less it looks like learning, the better!
2/06/2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
